Banca de DEFESA: RENATA ALVES PIRES

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : RENATA ALVES PIRES
DATE: 04/07/2022
TIME: 15:30
LOCAL: RNP Conferência
TITLE:

TEXTUAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC WORKS: imaginaries of the author in the light of discourse analysis

KEY WORDS:

Text review; text reviewer; academic writting; discourse analysis.

PAGES: 24
BIG AREA: Lingüística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Letras
SUMMARY:

This investigation studied representations of the proofreader in the imagination of the academic-scientific author, based on Michel Pêcheux's theory of Discourse Analysis and its developments in Brazil, with Eni Orlandi. We seek to understand, by analyzing the author's discourse, what this client expects in relation to the services provided, the role and responsibilities of the reviewer. We start from the assumption that, when contracting a textual revision, the academic-scientific author wants a broader intervention than a normative-orthographic-grammatical correction to be carried out. We believe – and we try to show – that this client profile, who writes works in the university environment with a focus on knowledge generation and scientific publication, seeks a partner in the reviewer to help in the construction of a final version of the text. For that, this professional must, in the author's view, interfere in the text at a discursive level - either correcting, realigning and adapting, or rewriting, if necessary -, so that this text can say, in the best possible way, what is being said. proposes. The corpus of analysis was based on the discourse materialized in conversations and exchanges of messages that academic authors established with the reviewer at the time of contracting and during the performance of the review service, through email, WhatsApp or comments in the margins of the text. We seek, in the movement of analysis, to dialogue with the most current theories in editing processes, which approach the reviewer's work not only from the point of view of grammatical correction, but also from a discursive perspective, as part of the editorial activity. We understand, therefore, that the reviewer, in the imagination of the academic-scientific author, is, indeed, that professional who finds and corrects errors and deviations in spelling, grammar and standardization; Beyond this function, however, the reviewer is also a co-enunciator, a co-scribe, a partner with whom the author shares responsibilities and to whom he grants autonomy to intervene in the construction of his text and discourse.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Presidente - ANA ELISA FERREIRA RIBEIRO
Interna - CARLA BARBOSA MOREIRA
Externa à Instituição - DANIELLA LOPES DIAS IGNÁCIO RODRIGUES
Interna - LILIAN APARECIDA ARAO